Volks AutosMonster Motorsport
Results 1 to 19 of 19
  1. #1
    Reverse Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    3

    S3 to A3 2.0 TFSI...is it a downgrade?

    This has become such a dilemma! I have been driving the S3 (210 bhp) for 4 years now. After reading all the wonderful reviews on the new A3, the desire to change is mounting, daily.

    No question it's a step down performance wise, but the 4 door and bigger interior on the new A3 is a big incentive, let alone the new look and the DSG gearbox.

    Has anyone gone from S3 to the 2.0 TFSI? How would you rate the overall performance and handling?

    Better yet, if given a choice between the 2.0 TFSI and the 3.2 Quattro, what would be your choice, assuming petrol cost is not a factor? I am just curious on how you would rate the performance and handling between the two models.

    Thanks very much!

  2. # ADS
    ADS
    Join Date
    Always
    Posts
    Many
     
  3. #2
    Cupramax's Avatar
    Uber pimp meister

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    455

    Re: S3 to A3 2.0 TFSI...is it a downgrade?

    I've gone from a Leon Cupra R which is basically S3 running gear minus the 4wd to a Sportback 2.0T Quattro and am well pleased with it. Its only slightly slower than the Leon was but the power spread is much wider than the 1.8T engine so you really dont notice it. Its almost like driving a normally aspirated car in fact. As you say, the new body is a lot roomier inside. I drove a 3.2 for a day on test drive as well and although it sounded fantastic the car felt very front heavy to me so I opted for the 2.0T. To be honest you'd be pushed to notice the difference as there's only half a second to 60 between them.... plus there are remaps appearing now for the 2.0T giving 3.2 performance.

  4. #3
    1st Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    WI Hudson
    Posts
    239

    Re: S3 to A3 2.0 TFSI...is it a downgrade?

    I've driven both and think the 3.2 kicks ass. The 2.0T is sweet, but not blistering. If petrol isn't a factor, you'd be nuts not to go for a 3.2.

  5. #4
    nervus's Avatar
    5th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,159

    Re: S3 to A3 2.0 TFSI...is it a downgrade?

    If it's performance your after then why don't you get a diesel with a superchip??? They keep up with chipped 2.0 FSIT's no problem.

  6. #5
    Eeef's Avatar
    Lord of War

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    South Coast, land of the white man
    Posts
    1,602

    Re: S3 to A3 2.0 TFSI...is it a downgrade?

    [ QUOTE ]
    If it's performance your after then why don't you get a diesel with a superchip??? They keep up with chipped 2.0 FSIT's no problem.

    [/ QUOTE ]

    Awww crap, there goes the neighbourhood...

  7. #6
    JaminBen's Avatar
    3rd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    France (ronRonrRRron)
    Posts
    532

    Re: S3 to A3 2.0 TFSI...is it a downgrade?

    hwmin, have you searched this A3 8P forum? There are lots of threads that have dealt with 2.0T vs 3.2, with lots of great information and individual input.

  8. #7
    Cupramax's Avatar
    Uber pimp meister

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    455

    Re: S3 to A3 2.0 TFSI...is it a downgrade?

    Whats the C02 got to do with it or are you saying Audi are showing different weights? if so I cant see them???

  9. #8
    DavidR's Avatar
    Moderator

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    1,295

    Re: S3 to A3 2.0 TFSI...is it a downgrade?

    The weights listed on the pricelists are those used to work out C02 calculations and tax implications (apparently)...

  10. #9
    2nd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    320

    Re: S3 to A3 2.0 TFSI...is it a downgrade?

    Fuzzynapper. I am contemplating changing my remapped S3 to the 3.2 quattro sportline and prhaps you could give me a quick comparsion to the 2 cars that would help me. I was waiting from the new S3 but am getting fed up of waiting so am thinkg of 3.2q until the S3 has been launched.

  11. #10
    fuzzynapper's Avatar
    Neutral

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    42

    Re: S3 to A3 2.0 TFSI...is it a downgrade?

    Nicks3,
    I too got fed up waiting for the new S3 , so opted for the 3.2 S-Line.
    Starting with looks- the 3.2 is similar in ‘aggressive’ looks as the S3 was, particularly with the larger wheels & brake disks on the 3.2.
    The suspension on the 3.2 whilst sporting is not the bone crusher it was on the S3. (My head used to hit the roof if I hit the speed bumps too quick)
    The brakes, helped by the bigger disks are much better on the 3.2, and do not fade as much as the old ones.
    As I mentioned earlier I do miss the kick back when the turbo kicked in on the S3 – especially on motorways when going from 6th to 5th gear and seeing Chav Boy in his Corsa disappear into the distance. Saying that the 3.2 has a great power band throughout the revs, more-so above 4000 revs, and if a throaty rasp floats your boat, you do get a good growl with the 3.2.
    I spend a lot of my time in the car, ok the 3.2 is more thirsty, but if your not heavy with your right foot you can average 26-28 mpg normal, with 30mpg on the motorway (keeping within the law).

    The above are just my own views, everyone has a different opinion.
    For the best comparison take out a 3.2 and the 2.0TFSI from your local stealer and see for yourself, but you must try the DSG - you don't need a pipe & slippers to have it !!!!
    Don’t know where you are in the East Mids, so am I, and deal with Audi in Lincoln, Leicester & Derby, and are all dying for your business.

    Roll on the new S3...... [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/ok.gif[/img]

  12. #11
    Reverse Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    3

    Re: S3 to A3 2.0 TFSI...is it a downgrade?

    Thanks for all the feedback. I'm leaning towards the 3.2. After driving and modding the 1.8T engines since '97 (from A4 to S3), I just don't feel like going through the same routine again with the 2.0T, albeit its potential. Having said that, the 3.2 N/A set up will for sure help curb that mod itch and at the same time provide adequate power when needed.

    I only wish the dealer here in Hong Kong would get their act together and launch the car soon.

  13. #12
    1st Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    howden, yorkshire
    Posts
    288

    Re: S3 to A3 2.0 TFSI...is it a downgrade?

    [ QUOTE ]
    [ QUOTE ]
    [ QUOTE ]
    If it's performance your after then why don't you get a diesel with a superchip??? They keep up with chipped 2.0 FSIT's no problem.

    [/ QUOTE ]

    Awww crap, there goes the neighbourhood...

    [/ QUOTE ]

    What do you mean?

    [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/noidea.gif[/img]

    [/ QUOTE ]

    don't be naughty nervus

  14. #13
    imported_kkline
    Guest

    Re: S3 to A3 2.0 TFSI...is it a downgrade?

    In last months Audi Driver Mag an A3 2.0TQ manual with a superchip produced performance figures that are not far off the S4.

    0-60 -> A3 2.0t=5.8sec, S4=5.5sec, A3 3.2=6.3sec
    0-80 -> A3 2.0t=8.5sec, S4=8.4sec, A3 3.2=10.4sec

    The superchip upgrade is rated at 244hp@6183rpm and 235ft/lbs@2572rpm. Quite conservative considering what MTM apparently has on the way.

    The 3.2 is way off the mark of a chipped 2.0t.

  15. #14
    1st Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    250

    Re: S3 to A3 2.0 TFSI...is it a downgrade?

    Blah, blah, blah... When I grow up I'll not use such foul language and offense....

  16. #15
    1st Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    howden, yorkshire
    Posts
    288

    Re: S3 to A3 2.0 TFSI...is it a downgrade?

    [ QUOTE ]
    Nervus would you ever shut your face ya little pigs prick.

    [/ QUOTE ]

    Gentlemen, start your engines....

    [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/10_1_114.gif[/img]

  17. #16
    nervus's Avatar
    5th Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,159

    Re: S3 to A3 2.0 TFSI...is it a downgrade?

    Something i said Mark_N?

  18. #17
    2nd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    320

    Re: S3 to A3 2.0 TFSI...is it a downgrade?

    Thanks fuzzynapper I apprecite your thoughts. So after living with both cars for a while, is there much performance differnece between the remapped S3 and the 3.2?

  19. #18
    2nd Gear

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    320

    Re: S3 to A3 2.0 TFSI...is it a downgrade?

    amd 270bhp...so you realy think the 3.2 is as quick if not even quicker in everyday use than a remapped s3? That would be very good!!

  20. #19
    DavidR's Avatar
    Moderator

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    1,295

    Re: S3 to A3 2.0 TFSI...is it a downgrade?

    [ QUOTE ]
    amd 270bhp...so you realy think the 3.2 is as quick if not even quicker in everyday use than a remapped s3? That would be very good!!

    [/ QUOTE ]

    Ah, that old chestnut again... 270bhp from a remap on an s3... I think not. 250ish is more realistic which puts in on a par with the 3.2... If you figure the 3.2 produces more power consistently at the top end compared with the turbo engine the differences may not be as huge as you might imagine...

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO

Garage Plus, Vendor Tools vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO