rich-s3 said:I have got a 2000 model s3 and i want to change suspension to lower the ride hight by around 40mm but i don't want it to be any stiffer than standard, can anyone recomend any kits?
Ess_Three said:If you lower it 40mm and don't go quite a lot stiffer you'll rip your sump off at some point. Mine was buffed at a 20-25mm drop.
Going lower (40mm) WILL ****** up the handling completely...
And the S3 is truly awful on standard suspension as it is...why on earth you'd want to lower it 40mm and not uprate to something at least half capable is a strange choice.
Aky said:I think awful is a little harsh. They are a cracking little motor, and due a little respect.
mikerd4 said:what suspension mods have you done ess3?
Ess_Three said:I can only suspect that you've never driven cars with proper suspension control, before you'd make a comment like that.
The S3 understeers everywhere, wallows on fast corners, is unstable under heavy braking, unstable on roundabouts under power (ESP all over the place as a result) and wears it's dampers out in under 6000 miles from new.
That's afwul in my book.
Not befitting a car that cost nearly £30k when new.
rich-s3 said:my s3 does understeer a fair amount but if you just dab the brake with your left foot in mid corner it completely cuts that out and also stops the esp cutting in. also good fun
Aky said:I think i'll feel free to ignore most things you say...........
Aky said:So in that case why did you buy the car in the first place?
I'm not saying its the best setup in the world, but like above its due some respect.
As for only suspecting that I haven't driven cars with proper suspension control
I think i'll feel free to ignore most things you say...........
TRS1 said:I've not driven an S3 yet so can't comment on that, but as far as supercars go, the porka isn't the best handling of them all is it?!...
ChriS3 said:Not good driving technique! Careful how you do it, and don't do it if someone's following you closely!
leecs3 said:Its pretty common technique for tightening your line if your overtaking on the track (diving down the inside) or overcooked it defending the line. Can't think why you'd use this on the public road tho'.
Ess_Three said:Thanks for the kind words folks...
But I don't think I'm right all the time...
Ess_Three said:My C4S is the most rewarding car I've ever driven...and the fastest point to point, whan you get keyed into how to drive it.
It took me 2 years to get keyed in.
The 1st year if frightened me. A lot.
My tweaked S3 was almost as quick at sub 100 MPH speeds..but not rewarding in any way.
I don't think you'd find much that's faster over 100 miles of Highland roads, all weathers, than a C4S.
The Evos come close...as do some STIs...but you can murder them on the brakes!
Ess_Three said:******!
It only helps mask the ****** chassis....
Sort the chassis and you don't need it.
2 ways of addressing the same problem...either sort the chassis organically (revised suspension) or use electronics to send torque to the rear to get similar understeer reducing results.
Although, both reduce understeer, in my humble opinion, one will give superior body control at the edges of grip...a Haldex controller can assist balance and kill understeer...but it can't add grip.
You pays your money, and takes your choice...
ChriS3 said:Fool!!!
The ideal way of doing it is to optimise the chassis as best you can through revised suspension etc., then add the Haldex controller. Best of both worlds
TRS1 said:Don't get me wrong, a GT3 would be one of my dream cars, but that whole engine over the rear wheels thing is just wrong!
How about a Gallardo for the 100 mile Highland challenge?
Ess_Three said:My C4S is the most rewarding car I've ever driven...and the fastest point to point, whan you get keyed into how to drive it.
It took me 2 years to get keyed in.
The 1st year if frightened me. A lot.
My tweaked S3 was almost as quick at sub 100 MPH speeds..but not rewarding in any way.
I don't think you'd find much that's faster over 100 miles of Highland roads, all weathers, than a C4S.
The Evos come close...as do some STIs...but you can murder them on the brakes!
AndybS3 said:Cut out the all weather option and I may take up the challenge Glen
S3 AD said:I think its the engine hanging out the back of the Porker that makes it so hard to get used to, I had a 997 C4S for a long week end, and to say I was disappointed was an understatement it felt awful, so I am not sure I would want to get used to that. When I drove a Gallardo (just for one day) it felt so much more natural to push it hard and enjoy it. Since both of those experiences I have spoken to a few 911 owners and most have attmitted that it takes a long time to get used to driving a 911 fast. I did not get used to it in a week end and have never been in one that is being driven by someone who is used to it so unfrotunatly I do not see what all the fuss is about and tbh I would rather be in my slightly modified S3 on 99% of roads over a standard 911. Then again I would take the Gallardo over ANYTHING - I loved every second
Aky said:I think awful is a little harsh. They are a cracking little motor, and due a little respect.
leave1 said:lol, no they ******* aren't. They are absolutely awful as stock. If you'd ever driven anything half decent you would agree. A "cracking little motor" is a clio 182.
S3's only become a cracking little motor once you sort the chassis out.
TRS1 said:Sorry, I did mean the new one that was on topgear a couple of weeks ago.
My work mate used to work for Mclaren and now preps track day cars for people in his spare time. His mate has just got a new GT3 RS and I'm hoping to go a spin in it soon as he regularly brings his cars to work.
Ess_Three said:No problem...let's go...